McCollum Sues Federal Government Over Health CarePublished: 2010-07-13 21:18:27Author: Tim Kephart | CBS 4 | March 23, 2010Minutes after President Barack Obama signed into law the health care reform act, Florida attorney general Bill McCollum joined 11 other
Republican attorneys general and 1 Democratic attorney general in a
lawsuit to overturn the health care reform act. The lawsuit, filed in
Pensacola, focuses on the provision in the health care reform bill that
mandates citizens to purchase health care insurance.
"This bipartisan effort by Attorneys General around the country should
put the Federal Government on notice that we will not tolerate the
constitutional rights of our citizens and the sovereignty of our states
to be trampled on," said Attorney General McCollum. "I will pursue this litigation to the highest court if
necessary."
McCollum's staff told
CBS4.com's Tim Kephart that the
mandate to purchase health care insurance essentially was a "living"
tax. In other words, McCollum's claim was that it's unconstitutional for
the government to mandate you purchase health insurance just because
you're alive.
His Democratic opponent in the gubernatorial campaign, Florida CFO Alex
Sink, fired back at McCollum for using his office for political gain and
wasting taxpayer money.
"Lawsuits and partisanship won't do anything to help Floridians get
better health care," Sink said in a statement sent to CBS4.com's
Kephart. "But if Bill McCollum brought the same kind of energy to
fighting Medicaid fraud as attorney general, Medicaid fraud might not be
costing Floridians an estimated $3.2 billion every year.
Fellow Democrat, Florida Senator Dan Gelber echoed Sink's sentiments.
"We live in a state with a full-blown health care crisis. AG McCollum
has a pattern of blocking health care," Gelber said. "He is spending
million to defend the state's failure to provide medical and dental care
to poor and disabled children (a suit that should have settled years
ago.)
McCollum said the new bill invades the sovereignty of the states; states
can't afford it; and others at a Tuesday press conference from McCollum
made reference to a states' rights argument.
Specifically, McCollum said the mandate exceeds the powers of the United
States under Article I of the Constitution and violates the Tenth
Amendment to the Constitution. He further states the tax penalty
constitutes an unlawful direct tax "in violation of Article I, sections 2
and 9 of the Constitution."
Full story