'RAP' Doctor Billing Controversy ContinuesPublished: 2009-07-07 18:31:57Author: Ted Griggs | Medical News Inc | June 22, 2009
Physicians, hospitals and health insurers have defeated a proposed
state law that would have forced insurers to cover out-of-network
physicians' charges consumers incurred at in-network hospitals.
However,
healthcare industry members say the issue is not dead, and they expect
to see legislation addressing the topic next year.
Dr.
Steven B. Spedale, a member of the Louisiana State Medical Society's
Board of Councilors, said a major problem is that hospital patients
often don't know who is in their network or what physicians will be
treating them.
"I have yet to meet a person … who
has read their whole insurance book. When you get it, it's so long,"
Spedale said. "Most of us look at schedule of benefits, but nobody
really reads the rest of it."
The benefits
schedule doesn't actually list the in-network physicians, Spedale said.
The healthcare system needs to reach the point where patients know what
insurance product they are buying, what it covers, and which doctors
are at what hospitals. Once patients have all that information, they
can make informed decisions, Spedale said.
Insurers,
hospitals and physicians need to figure out a way to put together a
system that will get that information to consumers when they need it.
It's unclear what the best method is to accomplish that.
A
proposed law would require insurers to post an online database of its
in-network radiologists, anesthesiologists, pathologists,
neonatologists and emergency medicine doctors, their addresses and
business numbers by March 31, 2010. SB 282 has passed the full Senate
and the House Insurance Committee with no opposition and appears likely
to be adopted as law.
However, the bill does not make clear how people without Internet access will be able to get the information.
What
is clear is that hospitals, physicians and health insurers oppose the
solution backed by Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon.
Donelon
has said a common practice among hospitals – contracting with a single
group of radiologists, anesthesiologists and pathologists – often
victimized consumers.
Full story